Cases 1 - 8 of 8
Payne v. Shianna et al
as 4:2024cv00188
Plaintiff:
Markus OShea Payne
Defendant:
Shianna, Brittany, Correctional Health Care Services and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Owens v. CEO and Chief Physician of Armor Correctional Health Care Services, Inc. 4960
as 1:2021cv24142
Plaintiff:
Michael W. Owens
Defendant:
CEO and Chief Physician of Armor Correctional Health Care Services, Inc. 4960
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Franklin Collins, Jr. v. Johnny Bates, et al
as 17-14559
Plaintiff - Appellant:
FRANKLIN D. COLLINS, JR.
Defendant - Appellee:
JOHNNY BATES, Dr., C.E.O. Health, Quality Corrections Health Care Service, in his individual and official capacity, DR. RONN, Dentist, Quality Corrections Health Care Service and/or Montgomery County Detention Facility, in his individual and official capacity, WANDA J. ROBINSON, Director of Montgomery County Detention Facility, in her individual and official capacity and others
Jerome Dunson v. Bill Kissell
as 10-14118
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JEROME DUNSON
Defendant - Appellee:
BILL KISSELL, Director, Georgia Department of Correctional Health Care Services
Leigh v. Davis et al
as 3:2010cv00138
Plaintiff:
Philip Leigh
Defendant:
Don Davis, G.A. Espino, Miguel Gonzalez and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Dunson v. Georgia Department of Correctional Health Care Services
as 4:2008cv00163
Plaintiff:
Jerome Dunson
Defendant:
Georgia Department of Correctional Health Care Services
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Ramos v. Armo Correctional Health Care Services
as 2:2007cv14304
Plaintiff:
Jose Ramos
Defendant:
Armo Correctional Health Care Services
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 State Prisoner Civil Rights
Holly v. Armor Correctional Health Care Services
as 2:2007cv14296
Plaintiff:
Donald Holly, Jr.
Defendant:
Armor Correctional Health Care Services
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 State Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
