Cases 1 - 10 of 39
Baker v. Michigan Department of Corrections et al
as 2:2013cv10230
Plaintiff:
Robert Baker
Defendant:
Michigan Department of Corrections, Correctional Medical Services, Incorporated, Prison Health Services, Incorporated and others
Carmichael v. Correctional Medical Services et al
as 2:2012cv13594
Plaintiff:
Karlos Carmichael
Defendant:
Correctional Medical Services, Nick Ludwick, Scott L Holmes and others
Schweiger v. Correctional Medical Services, Incorporated et al
as 2:2011cv15345
Plaintiff:
Timothy Schweiger
Defendant:
Correctional Medical Services, Incorporated, Prison Health Services, Incorporated, Pain Management Committee and others
Allen v. Shawney et al
as 1:2011cv10942
Plaintiff:
Charmel Allen
Defendant:
Shawney, C. Stovall, Yukins and others
Washington v. Piper et al
as 5:2011cv10449
Plaintiff:
Clarence Washington
Defendant:
Paul Piper, Sheila Baskin, Hope S Heebsh and others
Seals v. Scutt et al
as 2:2010cv15054
Plaintiff:
Nicholas Seals
Defendant:
Debra Scutt , B Gardon, B Clement and others
Casanova v. Michigan Department of Corrections et al
as 2:2010cv13950
Plaintiff:
Roberto Casanova
Defendant:
Michigan Department of Corrections, Correctional Medical Services, Incorporated, Scott Holmes and others
Nali v. Correctional Medical Services, Incorporated et al CASE TRANSFERRED
as 2:2010cv12368
Plaintiff:
Frank Nali
Defendant:
Correctional Medical Services, Incorporated, Ivens, Hutchinson and others
Ruud v. Correctional Medical Services, Incorporated et al CASE TRANSFERRED
as 2:2010cv12204
Plaintiff:
Thomas Ruud
Defendant:
Correctional Medical Services, Incorporated, Onuigbo, George J Pramstaller and others
Sparks v. Prison Health Services, Incorporated et al CASE TRANSFERRED
as 5:2010cv11402
Plaintiff:
Brian Sparks
Defendant:
Prison Health Services, Incorporated, Correction Medical Services, Incorporated, Patricia L Caruso and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
