Cases 1 - 10 of 19
LaRue v. Rubenstein et al
as 2:2016cv05853
Plaintiff:
William Allen LaRue
Defendant:
Jim Rubenstein, Correctional Medical Services and Wexford Health Sources Inc.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lynch v. Rubenstein et al
as 2:2012cv00399
Plaintiff:
John Jink Lynch
Defendant:
Jim Rubenstein, David Ballard, John Austin and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Cobb v. Correctional Medical Services et al
as 2:2011cv00283
Plaintiff:
Clennel P. Cobb
Defendant:
Correctional Medical Services and Jim Rubenstein
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Cobb v. Correctional Medical Services et al
as 1:2011cv00051
Plaintiff:
Clennel P. Cobb
Defendant:
Correctional Medical Services and Jim Rubenstein
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Gilmore v. Correctional Medical Services, Inc., et al
as 2:2009cv01075
Plaintiff:
Boyd Gilmore
Defendant:
Correctional Medical Services, Inc.,, Dr. Allen, Mary Westfall and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Gilmore v. Correctional Medical Services, Inc., et al
as 1:2009cv00136
Plaintiff:
Boyd Gilmore
Defendant:
Correctional Medical Services, Inc.,, Dr. Allen, Mary Westfall and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Pipes v. Correctional Medical Services
as 2:2009cv00921
Plaintiff:
James F. Pipes
Defendant:
Correctional Medical Services
Cause Of Action: 77 U.S.C. § 7777 Civil Shell Case Opening
Steele v. Shreve et al
as 2:2009cv00003
Plaintiff:
Mark Steele
Defendant:
John R. Shreve, Wexford Health Services, Correctional Medical Services and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Lewis v. Proctor et al
as 5:2008cv00167
Plaintiff:
Leslie M. Lewis
Defendant:
Dr. David Proctor, Correctional Medical Services, Inc. and Wexford Health Sources
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Gilmore v. Bloom et al.
as 2:2008cv00326
Plaintiff:
Boyd Gilmore
Defendant:
Louis H. Bloom, Rebecca Bostic, William Haines and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
