Cases 21 - 30 of 242
SZEMPLE v. CORRECTIONAL MEDICAL SERVICE INC. et al
as 3:2013cv01058
Plaintiff:
CRAIG FRANCIS SZEMPLE
Defendant:
CORRECTIONAL MEDICAL SERVICE INC., UNIVERSITY MEDICINE AND DENTISTRY, UCHC and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jesse Velasquez v. George Hayman, et al
as 12-4526
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JESSE VELASQUEZ
Defendant - Appellee:
GEORGE HAYMAN, Commissioner, KAREN BALICKI, Chief Administrator, ALLEN MARTIN and others
George Jackson v. Keith Ivens, et al
as 12-4155
Plaintiff - Appellant:
GEORGE A. JACKSON
Defendant - Appellee:
M.D. KEITH IVENS, PRISON HEALTH SER INC, STANLEY TAYLOR and others
BROWN v. NEW JERSEY DOC et al
as 1:2012cv05070
Plaintiff:
JERRY BROWN
Defendant:
NEW JERSEY DOC, JOHN DOE 1-15, JOHN DOE 16-30 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Monir George v. Warden
as 12-3128
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MONIR GEORGE
Defendant - Appellee:
WARDEN, NANCY PERSALL, WATSON, Judge and others
Myzel Frierson v. St. Francis Medical Center, et al
as 12-2684
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MYZEL FRIERSON
Defendant - Appellee:
ST. FRANCIS MEDICAL CENTER, CORRECTIONAL MEDICAL SERVICES, FRAN GREEN and others
LOPEZ v. CMS CORRECTIONAL MEDICAL SERVICES et al
as 3:2012cv03695
Plaintiff:
DAVID LOPEZ
Defendant:
CMS CORRECTIONAL MEDICAL SERVICES and JOAN TOBIAZ
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Stones v. McDonald et al
as 1:2012cv00711
Plaintiff:
Dereck E. Stones
Defendant:
Lawrence McDonald, Correctional Medical Services Inc., Correct Care Solutions and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Averill v. Celello et al
as 1:2012cv00599
Plaintiff:
Wayne R. Averill
Defendant:
Thomas F. Celello, Christina Jones, Robert Davenport and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Baker v. Markell et al
as 1:2012cv00443
Plaintiff:
Wayne T. Baker
Defendant:
Jack A. Markell, Matthew Denn, Jeffrey W. Bullock and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
