Cases 41 - 50 of 138
Kilpatrick v. Correctional Medical Services, Inc. (INMATE 1)
as 2:2011cv00791
Plaintiff:
Paul James Kilpatrick
Defendant:
Correctional Medical Services, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Horsman v. Bentley et al (INMATE 1)
as 2:2011cv00769
Plaintiff:
William W. Horsman, III
Defendant:
Robert Bentley , Kim Tobias Thomas , Leeposey Daniels and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Matthews v. White et al
as 1:2011cv00514
Plaintiff:
Scott Matthews
Defendant:
Warden White, Deputy Warden Mayers and Correctional Medical Services
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Williams v. Correctional Medical Services, Inc.
as 2:2011cv00718
Plaintiff:
Rhonda Jill Williams
Defendant:
Correctional Medical Services, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601
Cameron v. Alabama Department of Corrections Medical Providers et al
as 7:2011cv03113
Plaintiff:
Jimmy Frank Cameron
Defendant:
Alabama Department of Corrections Medical Providers, Whitley and Correctional Medical Services
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Head v. Jones et al (INMATE 1)
as 2:2011cv00633
Plaintiff:
Robert Head
Defendant:
Kenneth Jones, Dr. Siddiq , Kim Tobias Thomas and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Isbell v. Correctional Medical Services et al
as 1:2011cv00446
Plaintiff:
Lance Isbell
Defendant:
Correctional Medical Services and Dr. Barber
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Gillentine v. Correctional Medical Services et al
as 5:2011cv02694
Plaintiff:
Tommy James Gillentine
Defendant:
Correctional Medical Services, Hood, Barrett and others
Miscellaneou:
staff attorney
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Weaver v. Toney et al
as 1:2011cv00385
Plaintiff:
Gardner McKay Weaver
Defendant:
Debra Toney and Correctional Medical Services
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Mixon v. Corrections Medical Service et al
as 1:2011cv00367
Plaintiff:
Timothy L. Mixon
Defendant:
Corrections Medical Service, Tony Patterson and Ruth Naglich
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
