Cases 1 - 8 of 8
Shields et al v. Port Arthur Independent School District et al
as 1:2024cv00171
Plaintiff:
Robin Dennis Perry Shields and Corrections Officer JOHN DOE ONE
Defendant:
Port Arthur Independent School District, Mark Porterie and Monique Bienvenue
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Goss et al v. Ellis County Texas et al
as 3:2019cv01760
Plaintiff:
John Wilson, Aizah Wilson, Jena Rasco and others
Defendant:
Ellis County Medical Staff John/Jane Doe 1-5, Ellis County Correctional Officers John/Jane Doe 1-5, Ellis County and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Freeman v. Valdez et al
as 3:2019cv00332
Defendant:
Shamika Friar, T Banks, Stella Harris and others
Plaintiff:
Raymond Craig Freeman
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2017cv00583
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990
Koomson et al v. Dallas County et al
as 3:2012cv01355
Defendant:
Dallas County, Unknown Dallas County Correctional Officers and Dallas County Hospital District
Plaintiff:
Mary Koomson and Samuel Koomson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Dickson v. City of Mansfield et al
as 4:2011cv00499
Plaintiff:
Bryan Kerr Dickson
Defendant:
City of Mansfield, Warden at the Mansfield Law Enforcement Center-Jail Unit, Nurses at the Mansfield Law Enforcement Center and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Chryar-Byrd v. Texas Department of Criminal Justice Institutional Division et al
as 6:2011cv00157
Defendant:
Kimberly Briggs, Ruth Cumberland, FNU Ellisor and others
Plaintiff:
Tanya Chryar-Byrd
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Villescas v. Wiles et al
as 3:2011cv00019
Respondent:
Detective Borras, Detective Carillo, Adminstrator Don Collins and others
Petitioner:
Carlos Villescas
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
