Cases 1 - 10 of 50
Thomsen v. Armfield et al
as 5:2024cv00226
Plaintiff:
William C Thomsen
Defendant:
Cory Armfield and New Cordell City of
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Washburn v. Board of County Commissioners of the County of Garfield et al
as 5:2023cv01132
Plaintiff:
Dale Kim Washburn
Defendant:
Board of County Commissioners of the County of Garfield, Town of Waukomis, Cory Rink and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Roni Lynn Kitchen et al v. Board of County Commissioners for Garfield County et al
as 5:2023cv01070
Plaintiff:
Roni Lynn Kitchen
Defendant:
Board of County Commissioners for Garfield County, Garfield County Sheriffs Office, Cory Rink and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Thomsen v. Armfield et al
as 5:2023cv00904
Plaintiff:
William C Thomsen
Defendant:
Cory Armfield, Cordell Police Dept and Cordell City of
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Rich v. Baird et al
as 5:2023cv00883
Plaintiff:
JT Rich
Defendant:
Stephens County, Dexter Lawley, Cheyenne Underwood and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Cory v. Coterra Energy Inc et al
as 5:2022cv00518
Plaintiff:
Curtis Cory
Defendant:
Coterra Energy Inc and Cimarex Energy Co
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Other Contract
Kenneth W Cory Ltd v. General Inc et al
as 5:2022cv00464
Plaintiff:
Kenneth W Cory Ltd
Defendant:
General Inc and Chance Brown
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Fraud
Cory v. Ovintiv USA Inc et al
as 5:2021cv00568
Defendant:
Ovintiv USA Inc, Ovintiv Mid-Continent Inc and Ovintiv Inc
Plaintiff:
Curtis Cory
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Nelson v. Helm et al
as 5:2020cv01290
Defendant:
Shannon LNU, Aiden LNU, Ben Crooks and others
Plaintiff:
Cory Bryan Nelson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Cory et al v. Cimarex Energy Company
as 5:2020cv00706
Plaintiff:
Cheryl Cory and Curtis Cory
Defendant:
Cimarex Energy Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
