Cases 1 - 10 of 48
Rollerson v. FMC Fort Worth
as 4:2023cv01014
Plaintiff:
Braddic Deshaun Rollerson
Defendant:
FMC Fort Worth, Phil Sorrells, Counselor Cruz and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Paz v. David & Ivy Ministries et al
as 4:2022cv03337
Plaintiff:
Richard Allen Paz
Defendant:
David & Ivy Ministries, Manvel Fields, Unknown Lt. House inmates and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lampkin v. Amonett et al
as 5:2021cv00270
Petitioner:
Esaw Lampkin
Respondent:
A Amonett, David Reed, FNU Mermea and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Robinson v. United States of America et al.
as 3:2021cv00128
Defendant:
Warden S. Harjl, Anthony Robinson, United States of America and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Scott v. Gutierrez et al
as 4:2021cv01145
Defendant:
Tony Garcia, Tracy Long, D'Wayne Jernigan and others
Plaintiff:
Kevin Earl Scott
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Thompson v. McMahan et al
as 4:2020cv04004
Plaintiff:
Larry D. Thompson
Defendant:
Major J Wade, Captain J. McMahan, Assistant Warden J. Kent and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Victory Lap et al v. PHH Mortgage Corporation et al
as 4:2020cv03802
Defendant:
AVT Title, PHH Mortgage Corporation and Power Default Services, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Patriot Title, KQ WEST, Victory Lap and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Spalding v. John Doe Camp Counselor
as 3:2020cv03262
Plaintiff:
David Lyman Spalding
Defendant:
John Doe Camp Counselor
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Husband v. Warden Shults et al
as 1:2020cv00408
Defendant:
Unit Manager J. Tenner, Warden Shults and Corrections Counselor J. Bangart
Petitioner:
Eunice Husband
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Darby v. Shults et al
as 1:2020cv00317
Plaintiff:
Hanzha Darby
Defendant:
Admin. Warden Shults, Psychology Dr. Castillo, Nurse Hayes and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
