Cases 1 - 10 of 23
MCGRATH v. BENTON et al
as 1:2023cv13006
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL MCGRATH, JR.
Defendant:
C.O. BENTON, C.O. HERNANDEZ, L.T. MARRUSO and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
HAKIM v. DAKOTA ASSET SERVICES LLC et al
as 1:2022cv00587
Plaintiff:
KHALIL ABDUL HAKIM
Defendant:
DAKOTA ASSET SERVICES LLC, ROOSEVELT PARENT LLC, JEFFREY TOLL and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Torts to Land
EADS v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al
as 1:2021cv17369
Plaintiff:
CHRISTOPHER JUSTIN EADS
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, HSA C. HANSEN, WARDEN BERGAMI and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
FLY v. ROTH et al
as 1:2021cv09696
Plaintiff:
TONI FLY and WILLIAM ANTHONY FLY
Defendant:
JAY FERGUSON, DANIEL L HOVCAND, M SEGEL and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BUSS v. FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS et al
as 1:2021cv07590
Defendant:
CASE MANAGER CRAMER, CARVAJAL, M.D., COUNSELOR BROWN and others
Plaintiff:
JOSHUA BUSS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
TOMLINSON v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al
as 1:2020cv05531
Defendant:
COUNSELOR LEE, JOHN DOES 1-4, UNIT MANAGER MOORE and others
Plaintiff:
FLOYD TOMLINSON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
PERRY v. PLOUSIS et al
as 2:2018cv11224
Plaintiff:
GREGORY PERRY
Defendant:
JOHNDOE, LOPEZ, JANE ROE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
VAUGHN v. GEO GROUP et al
as 2:2018cv10148
Plaintiff:
LAMONT VAUGHN
Defendant:
GEO GROUP, JILL KILEY, DURANT and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
DIVORCE MARKETING GROUP v. STOLFE & ZEIGLER, COUNSELORS, AT LAW
as 3:2017cv06015
Plaintiff:
DIVORCE MARKETING GROUP
Defendant:
STOLFE & ZEIGLER, COUNSELORS, AT LAW
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
ROUDABUSH, JR. v. SAMUELS et al
as 1:2016cv00251
Plaintiff:
JAMES LESTER ROUDABUSH, JR.
Defendant:
CHARLES E. SAMUELS, JR, ADMINISTRATIVE REMEDY COORDINATOR, ADMINISTRATIVE REMEDY COORDINATOR FOR THE NORTHEAST REGIONAL OFFICE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
