Cases 1 - 10 of 14
Lumpkin v. SCORE Jail Disciplinary Committee et al
as 2:2023cv01092
Plaintiff:
Robert Joseph Lumpkin, Jr and Wonderful Counselor
Defendant:
SCORE Jail Disciplinary Committee and Classification
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lumpkin et al v. SCORE Jail et al
as 2:2023cv00963
Plaintiff:
Robert Joseph Lumpkin, Jr and Wonderful Counselor
Defendant:
SCORE Jail, City of Bellevue Prosecuting Attorney Office, City of Bellevue Police Department and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jones v. Department of Corrections et al
as 2:2021cv01334
Plaintiff:
Bartholomew Lee Jones
Defendant:
Department of Corrections, John Does 1-99, SOTP Therapist and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bounds v. Heinrich et al
as 2:2021cv00248
Plaintiff:
Ron Bounds
Defendant:
Kay Heinrich, Donna Byrnes, Counselor Kerr and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Mullen v. Washington State DOC et al
as 4:2020cv05069
Defendant:
Counselor Hill, Washington State DOC, Thurston County Superior Court and others
Plaintiff:
Aden Sean Mullen
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Cyprian v. White et al
as 3:2019cv05047
Defendant:
CO Depew, CO Coleman, CO Davis and others
Plaintiff:
Randolph Cyprian
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Mighell v. Snohomish County et al
as 2:2017cv00051
Plaintiff:
Mathew Mighell
Defendant:
Snohomish County, Snohomish Sheriff, Snohomish County Corrections and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Cox v. Saywers et al
as 3:2015cv05584
Plaintiff:
John L. Cox
Defendant:
C/O Saywers , Counselor Southwick , Counselor Kerr and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2015cv01028
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 0157
Fuentes v. Escandon et al
as 2:2015cv00071
Plaintiff:
Nicholas A Fuentes, III
Defendant:
Gilbert Escandon, Hill, Criswell Kennedy and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
