Cases filed in the Second Circuit Courts
Cases 1 - 10 of 92
The Church of Holy Redemption v. Wendell, Jr.
as 24-956
Plaintiff: Pastor DEAN J. SANDSTROM and THE CHURCH OF HOLY REDEMPTION
Defendant: PAUL WENDELL, JR., Individually and in his official capacity as Chautauqua County Executive, KIM A. MELEEN, Individually and in her official capacity as Chautauqua County Director of Real Property Services, TODD THOMAS, Individually and in his official capacity as Assistant Chautauqua County Attorney and others
Ifeji v. Garland
as 24-484
Defendant: BRETT EISELE, central pinal justice court precinct 3 judge et al., Central Pinal Justice Court Precinct 3 HEIRS AND ASSIGNS, MARIAN BROWN, dallas county sherrif et al., DALLAS COUNTY SHERRIFS OFFICE HEIRS AND ASSIGNS, GLENN HEGAR, texas secretary of state et al., TEXAS COMPTROLLERS OFFICE HEIRS AND ASSIGNS and others
Plaintiff: JAZZLYN SHABERA IFEJI, a Mooress beneficiary EMPRESS JAZLIN TRUST A Empress, Admiral, Mariner A, Merchant, Piloter Nations a private Moor aboriginal texan national territory of Spain, JAZZLYN SHABERA IFEJI ESTATE ET. AL., beneficiary, JOSEPH EDDIE PRYOR ESTATE ET AL., beneficiary JOSEPH EDDIE PRYOR et al. and others
Ifeji et al v. garland et al
as 1:2024cv00030
Plaintiff: Jazzlyn Shabera Ifeji, Jazzlyn Shabera Ifeji Estate et al., Joseph Eddie Pryor Estate et al. and others
Defendant: merrick garland attorney general et al., United States Department of Justice HEIRS AND ASSIGNS doing business as MERRICK GARLAND, andrew saul commissioner et al., Social Security Administration HEIRS AND ASSIGNS doing business as ANDREW SAUL, janet louise yellen secretary of the treasury et al., United States Department of the Treasury HEIRS AND ASSIGNS doing business as JANET LOUISE YELLEN and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
barclay et al v. dixon et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2023cv10272
Plaintiff: leshawn maurice barclay
Defendant: webb, jeremiah darnell Estate et al, barclay, noah sencer robert Estate et al, lynch, malakai levi Estate et al and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Randall v. Oneil
as 23-7616
Plaintiff / Appellant: JARROD CARL RANDALL and Jarrod C. Randall
Defendant / Appellee: COLLEEN M. ONEIL, Former Sheriff, BRIAN R. MCDERMOTT, Former Under-Sheriff, PETER R. BARNETT, Sheriff and others
Williams II v. County of Onondaga
as 23-891
Plaintiff / Appellant: Charles R. Williams
Defendant / Appellee: County of Onondaga, County Attorney, City of Syracuse, City Attorney, Onondaga Co. D.A.'s Office, District Attorney's Office and others
Palisades Estates EOM, LLC et al v. County of Rockland, New York et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 7:2023cv04215
Plaintiff: Palisades Estates EOM, LLC, Newburgh EOM LLC d/b/a Crossroads Hotel, Ratan Newburgh LLC d/b/a Ramada By Wyndham and others
Defendant: County of Rockland, New York, Edwin J. Day, in his official capacity as County Executive of Rockland County,, Town of Orangetown, New York and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 dj Fed. Question: Declaratory Judgment
Booth v. City of Watertown
as 23-811
Plaintiff / Appellant: Patrick M. Booth
Defendant / Appellee: City of Watertown, Watertown Police Department, Dustin C. Shawcross, Police Officer and others
Scuderi-Hunter v. Merklen
as 23-542
Plaintiff / Appellant: Dana Scuderi-Hunter
Defendant / Appellee: Amy B. Merklen, in her official capacity as the Delaware County Attorney, Tina B. Mole, in her official capaciity as Chairperson of the Delaware County Board of Supervisors, The Delaware County Board of Supervisors and others
Williams v. City of Auburn, NY et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 5:2023cv00240
Plaintiff: Ramaine Williams
Defendant: City of Auburn, NY, Cayuga County and District County Attorney for the City of Auburn and County of Cayuga
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?