Cases 31 - 40 of 141
DANTZIG v. County Of Westchester et al
as 7:2019cv08802
Defendant:
George Latimer, County Of Westchester and Anthony Scarpino
Plaintiff:
PAUL DANTZIG
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Boyd v. Village of Mamaroneck, et al
as 7:2019cv07569
Defendant:
County Of Westchester, Ahmed Perov, Cynthia Arce and others
Plaintiff:
Stephen A Boyd
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
McCormick v. Spano et al
as 1:2019cv02916
Defendant:
Commissioner Joseph K. Spano, Westchester County Jail, John and Jane Does 1-5 and others
Plaintiff:
Eric McCormick
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bonds v. County Of Westchester et al
as 7:2019cv01712
Defendant:
County Executive George Latimer, Westchester Department of Corrections, County Of Westchester and others
Plaintiff:
Etonya Bonds
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Lamont v. Rothman et al
as 1:2018cv08707
Defendant:
County of Westchester, Wayne Humphrey, Noreen T. Rothman and others
Plaintiff:
P. Stephen Lamont
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 cv
McLaughlin v. Pruyne et al
as 1:2018cv07470
Defendant:
W. Smiley, Doty Ricabene, County of Westchester and others
Plaintiff:
Don Alan McLaughlin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 cv
Lamont v. Reyes et al
as 1:2018cv07120
Defendant:
County of Westchester, Marsha Brown Mitchell, Anneliese Bonforte and others
Plaintiff:
P. Stephen Lamont
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2018cv05341
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Lamont v. Farucci
as 18-1366
Plaintiff - Appellant:
P. Stephen Lamont
Defendant - Appellee:
Leslie Farucci, Noreen T. Rothman and County of Westchester
Defendant:
Robin D. Carton, John Doe and Jane Doe
Lamont v. Reyes et al
as 4:2018cv01421
Plaintiff:
P. Stephen Lamont
Defendant:
Ramonita Reyes, Marsha Brown Mitchell, Leslie Farucci and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
