Cases 31 - 40 of 45
People of the State of Califor, et al v. United States Department of In, et al
as 12-55856
Plaintiff - Appellant:
PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA EX REL. IMPERIAL COUNTY AIR POLLUTION CONTROL DISTRICT, IMPERIAL COUNTY AIR POLLUTION CONTROL DISTRICT and COUNTY OF IMPERIAL
Defendant - Appellee:
UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF INTERIOR, KENNETH LEE SALAZAR, Secretary of the United States Department of Interior, UNITED STATES BUREAU OF RECLAMATION and others
Intervenor-Defendant - Appellee:
IMPERIAL IRRIGATION DISTRICT, SAN DIEGO COUNTY WATER AUTHORITY, COACHELLA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT and others
Kristin Perry, et al v. Arnold Schwarzenegger, et al
as 10-16751
Plaintiff - Appellee:
KRISTIN M. PERRY, SANDRA B. STIER, PAUL T. KATAMI and others
Intervenor-Plaintiff - Appellee:
CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO
Defendant:
ARNOLD SCHWARZENEGGER, in his official capacity as Governor of California, EDMUND G. BROWN, Jr., in his official capacity as Attorney General of California, MARK B. HORTON, in his official capacity as Director of the California Department of Public Health & State Registrar of Vital Statistics and others
Intervenor-Defendant:
DENNIS HOLLINGSWORTH, GAIL J. KNIGHT, MARTIN F. GUTIERREZ and others
Movant - Appellant:
COUNTY OF IMPERIAL, THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF THE COUNTY OF IMPERIAL and ISABEL VARGAS, In her official capacity as Deputy Clerk/Deputy Commissioner of Civil Marriages for the County of Imperial
County of Imperial v. National Union Fire Insurance Company of Pittsburgh, PA et al
as 3:2010cv01676
Plaintiff:
County of Imperial
Defendant:
National Union Fire Insurance Company of Pittsburgh, PA and DOES
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 10-55612
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Bloodworth v. County of Imperial et al
as 3:2009cv02672
Plaintiff:
Derek J Bloodworth
Defendant:
County of Imperial, Raymond Loera, DOES 1-10, inclusive and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
People of the State of California Ex Rel. Imperial County Air Pollution Control District et al v. United States Department of Interior et al
as 3:2009cv02233
Plaintiff:
People of the State of California Ex Rel. Imperial County Air Pollution Control District, Imperial County Air Pollution Control District and County of Imperial
Defendant:
United States Department of Interior, Ken Salazar, United States Bureau of Reclamation and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
Herrera v. Santana et al
as 3:2009cv01833
Plaintiff:
Christopher A. Herrera
Defendant:
Alfonso Z. Santana, James Bynum and County of Imperial
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Aguayo et al v. City of Holtville et al
as 3:2009cv01753
Plaintiff:
Yadira Aguayo, Pedro Campos, Ofelia Campos and others
Defendant:
City of Holtville, County of Imperial, Laura Fischer and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Montenegro v. County of Imperial et al
as 3:2009cv01242
Plaintiff:
Robert Montenegro
Defendant:
County of Imperial, G. Pacheco and Fernandez
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Perry et al v. Schwarzenegger et al
as 3:2009cv02292
Plaintiff:
Kristin M. Perry, Sandra B. Stier, Paul T. Katami and others
Intervenor:
Our Family Coalition, Lavender Seniors of the East Bay, Parents, Families, and Friends of Lesbians and Gays and others
Defendant:
Arnold Schwarzenegger, Edmund G. Brown, Jr., Mark B. Horton and others
Respondent:
William T. Criswell
Not Yet Classified:
Proposition 8 Official Proponents, Dennis Hollingsworth, Gail J. Knight and others
3Rd Party Defendant:
Californians Against Eliminating Basic Rights
Interested Party:
Media Coalition
Not Classified By Court:
Doug Swardstrom, Honorable Vaughn R. Walker, James L Garlow and others
Amicus Curiae:
City and County of San Francisco, ACLU Foundation of Northern California, Equality California and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
