Cases 1 - 8 of 8
Glen Fallin v. Covenant Transporation Group Inc, et al
as 23-1823
Plaintiff / Appellant:
GLEN M. FALLIN
Defendant / Appellee:
COVENANT TRANSPORATION GROUP INC, COVENANT TRANSPORT INC, STAR TRANSPORTATION INC and others
VAZQUEZ v. RUSSELL et al
as 2:2022cv04694
Plaintiff:
JOSHUA VAZQUEZ
Defendant:
EARL R RUSELL, COVENANT TRANSPORT INC., EARL R. RUSSELL and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
MUHAMMAD v. MASTERS et al
as 2:2022cv04666
Plaintiff:
Malcolm Muhammad
Defendant:
Mellissa A Masters, Covenant Transportation Inc., ABC COMPANIES 1-10 and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Auto Negligence
UNITED STATES FIRE INSURANCE COMPANY v. EAST COAST TRANSPORT & LOGISTICS, LLC et al
as 1:2016cv01837
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES FIRE INSURANCE COMPANY
Defendant:
EAST COAST TRANSPORT & LOGISTICS, LLC, SCHNEIDER NATIONAL CARRIERS, INC., SPECIALTY DELIVERY & LOGISTICS, INC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1335
VANDYCK et al v. NORMAN et al
as 2:2011cv04452
Plaintiff:
CHARLES VANDYCK and ROSE VANDYCK
Defendant:
ADREAN L. NORMAN , COVENANT TRANSPORT, INC. , JOHN DOES 1-10 and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
HALLIGAN et al v. HARRIS et al
as 2:2010cv01318
Plaintiff:
ANN MARIE HALLIGAN and ANTONIA HALLIGAN
Defendant:
JASON ALAN HARRIS, COVENANT TRANSPORT INC. , GEICO INDEMNITY COMPANY and others
Counter_claimant:
COVENANT TRANSPORT INC.
Counter_defendant:
ANN MARIE HALLIGAN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Tort/Non-Motor Vehic
SHELTON v. CHAMPLIN et al
as 2:2008cv03757
Plaintiff:
GLADYS SHELTON
Defendant:
DAVID CHAMPLIN and COVENANT TRANSPORT, INC.
Cause Of Action: Diversity
CORNAVACA v. JOHNSTON et al
as 3:2007cv04924
Plaintiff:
KARLA V. CORNAVACA
Defendant:
DAVID B. JOHNSTON, JR., COVENANT TRANSPORT, INC. and JOHN DOES 1-10
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Tort/Motor Vehicle (P.I.)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
