Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv11995
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2020cv11361
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2020cv40090
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Karle et al v. Stellar Recovery Inc et al
as 3:2015cv30095
Plaintiff:
Alexis Karle and Paul Jones
Defendant:
Stellar Recovery Inc, I.C. System Inc, Credit Control Services Inc and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Credit Control Services, Inc. et al v. Noble Systems Corporation
as 1:2012cv11321
Defendant:
Noble Systems Corporation
Plaintiff:
Credit Control Services, Inc. , CCS Commercial LLC and Enterprise Associates LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Harper v. Credit Control Services, Inc.
as 1:2011cv10072
Plaintiff:
Judith Harper
Defendant:
Credit Control Services, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 151
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2009cv40220
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Credit Control Services, Inc. v. Traynor
as 1:2007cv12214
Plaintiff:
Credit Control Services, Inc. and Credit Control Services, Inc.
Defendant:
Daniel Traynor
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Credit Control Services, Inc. v. Sharpe et al
as 1:2007cv11461
Plaintiff:
Credit Control Services, Inc. and Credit Control Services, Inc.
Defendant:
Deborah Sharpe and The CMI Group
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Contract Dispute
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2007cv40169
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
