Cases 41 - 50 of 527
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv08913
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans With Disabilities Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv08101
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans With Disabilities Act
(PC) Garcia v. Denberg et al
as 2:2023cv02098
Plaintiff:
William Garcia and William Patrick Garcia
Defendant:
B Denberg, D. Cueva, C. Gipson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bonilla v. Cueva
as 4:2023cv04539
Petitioner:
Steven Wayne Bonilla
Respondent:
Daniel Cueva
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Leonel L. Nordhausen Cuevas v. B. Birkholz
as 2:2023cv07287
Petitioner:
Leonel L. Nordhausen Cuevas
Respondent:
B. Birkholz
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
(SS) Cuevas v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 2:2023at00814
Plaintiff:
Marisabel Cuevas
Defendant:
Commissisoner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
(SS) Cuevas v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 2:2023cv01786
Plaintiff:
Marisabel Cuevas
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
The Logistics Guys Inc. v. Cuevas et al
as 2:2023cv01592
Plaintiff:
The Logistics Guys Inc.
Defendant:
Dominick Cuevas and Tribal Logistics Inc.
Smith v. Cueva
as 5:2023cv03833
Petitioner:
Donte Marquee Smith
Respondent:
Acting Warden Daniel Cueva
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Deanna Bonds v. County of San Bernardino et al
as 5:2023cv01395
Plaintiff:
Deanna Bonds
Defendant:
County of San Bernardino, John Meyers, Alberto Cuevas and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
