Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Rohan Dhruva v. CuriosityStream, Inc.
as 24-1080
Plaintiff:
ROHAN DHRUVA and JOSHUA STERN
Defendant:
CURIOSITYSTREAM, INC.
Tejon v. CuriosityStream, Inc.
as 1:2023cv24658
Plaintiff:
Roger Tejon
Defendant:
CuriosityStream, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question
Dhruva et al v. CuriosityStream Inc.
as 1:2023cv02265
Plaintiff:
Rohan Dhruva and Joshua Stern
Defendant:
Curiosity Inc. and CuriosityStream Inc.
City of East St. Louis v. Netflix, Inc., et al
as 22-2905
Plaintiff / Appellant:
CITY OF EAST ST. LOUIS, ILLINOIS
Defendant / Appellee:
NETFLIX, INC., DISNEY PLATFORM DISTRIBUTION, INC., APPLE INC. and others
Distributed Media Solutions, LLC v. CuriosityStream Inc.
as 1:2022cv01353
Plaintiff:
Distributed Media Solutions, LLC
Defendant:
Curiositystream Inc.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271 Patent Infringement
Quantum Technology Innovations, LLC v. CuriosityStream Inc.
as 1:2022cv00585
Defendant:
CuriosityStream Inc., CuriosityStream Operating Inc., Curiosity, Inc., Learn and others
Plaintiff:
Quantum Technology Innovations, LLC
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271 Patent Infringement
Diatek Licensing LLC v. Curiositystream Inc.
as 1:2021cv01113
Plaintiff:
Diatek Licensing LLC
Defendant:
Curiositystream Inc.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271
City of East St. Louis v. Netflix, Inc. et al
as 3:2021cv00561
Defendant:
Peacock TV, LLC, DirectTV Corporation, Hulu, LLC and others
Plaintiff:
City of East St. Louis, Illinois and City of East St. Louis
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2021cv01384
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Rothchild Broadcast Distribution Systems, LLC v. Curiositystream, Inc.
as 8:2020cv03338
Defendant:
curiositystream, Inc.
Plaintiff:
rothchild broadcast distribution systems llc and Rothchild Broadcast Distribution Systems, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1338
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
