Cases 41 - 50 of 54
HARGRAVE v. CURRIE et al
as 1:2010cv01935
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM L. HARGRAVE
Defendant:
RODGER CURRIE and MICHAEL BAKER
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
GOODMAN v. BLOUNT et al
as 1:2010cv01793
Plaintiff:
GENE NELSON GOODMAN
Defendant:
CLARENCE D. BLOUNT, RICHARD E. CURRIE, RONNIE MCQUAIG and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
CURRY v. BANK OF AMERICA HOME LOANS SERVICING, L.P. et al
as 1:2010cv01651
Plaintiff:
LYMAR CURRY
Defendant:
BANK OF AMERICA HOME LOANS SERVICING, L.P. and BANK OF AMERICA, N.A.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
ARAGON v. FOLEY et al
as 1:2010cv01588
Defendant:
DAVID W. FOLEY, RYAN BRACKLEY, THOMAS J. CURRY and others
Plaintiff:
DERRICK JOHN ARAGON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2010cv00146
Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 11 U.S.C. § 8001 Bankruptcy Appeal
CURRY et al v. DEVILLE et al
as 1:2009cv00832
Plaintiff:
YOLANDA CURRY, SHAVON STEWART, DEBRA FINLEY and others
Defendant:
DELORES DEVILLE, DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA and MICHELLE RHEE
Cause Of Action: 20 U.S.C. § 1400 Civil Rights of Handicapped Child
CASH-CARTER et al v. DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA et al
as 1:2009cv00504
Plaintiff:
SHEILA CASH-CARTER, R.A., DUANE COATES and others
Defendant:
DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA, ADRIAN FENTY and MICHELLE RHEE
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
MOLINA-AGUILAR et al v. DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA et al
as 1:2009cv00190
Plaintiff:
URSULA MOLINA-AGUILAR, ALBERTA BATES, ALICE BEGEMAN and others
Defendant:
DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA and MICHELLE RHEE
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
BANKS v. GREER, et al
as 1:2008mc00308
Plaintiff:
FREDERICK BANKS
Defendant:
MILDRED GREER, CHRISTOPHER CURRY, EDEN WHITE and others
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
CURRY v. GONZALES et al
as 1:2007cv00199
Plaintiff:
BOBBY RAY CURRY, JR.
Defendant:
ALBERTO R. GONZALES, HARLEY LAPPIN and FRANCIS J. HARVEY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
