Cases filed in the U.S. Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit
Cases 1 - 10 of 109
US v. Jeriton Curry
as 24-6359
Plaintiff: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant: JERITON LAVAR CURRY, a/k/a Cheese
US v. Harold Currie, Jr.
as 24-4189
Plaintiff: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant: HAROLD LEE CURRIE, JR.
Sandra Wilder-Rhodan v. Nancy McLin
as 24-1249
Plaintiff: SANDRA WILDER-RHODAN, Beneficiary of Estate of George M. Rhodan
Defendant: JUDGE NANCY CHAPMAN MCLIN, State of South Carolina, Family Court, J. GRAHAM STURGIS, JR., Attorney, VERONICA SMALLS, Attorney and others
US v. Roosevelt Curry
as 24-4170
Plaintiff: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant: ROOSEVELT CURRY
Jeriton Curry v. Max Cogburn
as 23-7302
Plaintiff: JERITON LAVAR CURRY
Defendant: MAX O. COGBURN, JR., United States District Judge, DAVID CAYER, United States Magistrate Judge, DAVID C. KEESLER, United States Magistrate Judge and others
Jimmy Edwards v. CSX Transportation, Inc.
as 23-1909
Plaintiff / Appellant: JIMMY EDWARDS, ROBERT HUNT, DOLORES HUNT and others
Plaintiff: ANTOINETTE MOORE and LINDA SAMPSON
Defendant / Appellee: CSX TRANSPORTATION, INCORPORATED
Defendant: CSX CORPORATION and CSX INTERMODAL TERMINALS, INCORPORATED
Albert Anderson v. Winston Salem Police Department
as 23-6609
Plaintiff / Appellant: ALBERT ANDERSON
Defendant / Appellee: WINSTON-SALEM POLICE DEPARTMENT, Sued in official capacity, BOBBY KIMBROUGH, Chief of sheriff sued in individual and official capacity, CATRINA THOMPSON, Chief of police sued in individual and official capacity and others
Jeriton Curry v. US
as 23-6128
Petitioner / Appellant: JERITON LAVAR CURRY
Respondent / Appellee: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
US v. Clifton Currie
as 22-4718
Plaintiff / Appellee: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant: CLIFTON DELWAYN CURRIE
US v. Freddie Curry
as 22-7324
Plaintiff / Appellee: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant: FREDDIE LEE CURRY, a/k/a King of da Hood, a/k/a Rat

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?