Cases 1 - 10 of 18
Shattuck-Knaebel v. Missouri Department of Corrections et al
as 4:2024cv00454
Defendant:
Unknown Nichols, Missouri Department of Corrections, Bed Broker at Fulton Reception Diagnostic Center (2015) and others
Plaintiff:
Charles D. Shattuck-Knaebel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Paul v. Davis et al
as 4:2024cv00458
Plaintiff:
Rico Paul
Defendant:
Brian Davis, Caleb Thompson, Justin Conway and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Prince v. Curry
as 2:2023cv00066
Plaintiff:
Moneka Prince
Defendant:
Scott E. Curry
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Dutcher v. Precythe et al
as 4:2023cv01553
Plaintiff:
Michael Aaron Dutcher
Defendant:
Anne Precythe, Jason Lewis, Travis Terry and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Curry v. Cutt et al
as 2:2023cv00048
Plaintiff:
Brittany Samantha Curry
Defendant:
David Cutt, Joey Runyon, Angela Mesmer and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Isaac v. Precythe et al
as 4:2023cv00689
Plaintiff:
Harold D. Isaac
Defendant:
Anne L. Precythe, Teri Vandergriff, Jennifer Currie and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Curry v. Women's Eastern Reception Diagnostic and Correctional Center
as 4:2021cv00079
Defendant:
Women's Eastern Reception Diagnostic and Correctional Center
Plaintiff:
Brittany Samantha Curry
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Furr v. Hazelwood, Missouri, City of et al
as 4:2018cv01400
Defendant:
Brendan Gilbert, City of Hazelwood, Missouri, Matthew Curry and others
Plaintiff:
Bernard Furr
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Paige v. Howell et al
as 6:2017cv03415
Plaintiff:
Lacey Kurt Paige
Defendant:
Steve Howell, Dixie Curry, Eric Jones and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Kirk et al v. Howell et al
as 6:2017cv03364
Plaintiff:
Andre R Kirk
Defendant:
Steve Howell, Eric Jones, Dixie Curry and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
