Cases 1 - 10 of 21
Easom v. Mello et al
as 1:2023cv01489
Plaintiff:
Warren Edwin Easom
Defendant:
Maia Mello, Clayton Joseph Lance and Curry County Sheriff's Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Easom v. Lance et al
as 6:2023cv01409
Plaintiff:
Warren Edwin Easom
Defendant:
Clayton J. Lance, Maia Mello, Curry County, OR, Sheriff's Department and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Curry v. City of Hillsboro et al
as 3:2023cv00152
Plaintiff:
Anthony Lenaire Curry
Defendant:
City of Hillsboro, County of Washington, City of Beaverton and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Curry v. City of Hillsboro et al
as 2:2023cv00144
Petitioner:
Anthony Lenaire Curry
Respondent:
City of Hillsboro and County of Washington
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv00196
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Curry v. State of Oregon et al
as 2:2021cv00908
Respondent:
Superintendent Erin Reyes, Two Rivers Correctional Institution, State of Oregon and others
Petitioner:
Anthony Lenaire Curry
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Curry v. State of Oregon et al
as 3:2021cv00150
Defendant:
State of Oregon, Kevin Barton and Glen Ujifusa
Plaintiff:
Anthony Lenaire Curry
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Poulson v. Tiffany et al
as 3:2020cv01702
Defendant:
Sgt. Tiffany, Officer Curry and Portland Police Bureau
Plaintiff:
Kermit Ty Poulson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Curry v. State of Oregon
as 3:2019cv01479
Petitioner:
Anthony Lenaire Curry
Respondent:
State of Oregon
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Curry v. State of Oregon
as 3:2019cv01346
Petitioner:
Anthony Lenaire Curry
Respondent:
State of Oregon
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
