Cases 11 - 20 of 160
Curry v. Hasty et al
as 7:2022cv00733
Petitioner:
Donell Curry
Respondent:
Denise Hasty and Attorney General of the State of Alabama
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Curry v. State of Alabama et al
as 7:2022cv00395
Plaintiff:
Donell Curry
Defendant:
State of Alabama, Reform Alabama City Police Department, Pickens County, Alabama and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Guilford et al v. QBE Specialty Insurance Company
as 1:2022cv00087
Plaintiff:
Oliver Guilford and Beverly Currie
Defendant:
QBE Specialty Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity Action
Curry v. Philips North America, LLC et al
as 2:2022cv00070
Plaintiff:
Thomas Curry
Defendant:
Philips North America, LLC, Philips Healthcare Informatics, Inc., Philips RS North America LLC and others
Not Classified By Court:
KONINKLIJKE PHILIPS ELECTRONICS N.V.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Curry v. Social Security Administration, Commissioner
as 1:2021cv01489
Plaintiff:
Christie Densmore Curry
Defendant:
Social Security Administration, Commissioner
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2021cv01293
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2021cv01259
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Curry v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company
as 1:2021cv00709
Defendant:
State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company
Plaintiff:
Shaneka Curry
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Plott v. Clay et al (INMATE 1)
as 2:2021cv00085
Defendant:
Prison Health Service, Jimmy Thomas, Brandon Mack and others
Plaintiff:
Cedric Curry Plott
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
curry v. wright
as 1:2020cv00590
Respondent:
diedra wright
Petitioner:
estella curry
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
