Cases 1 - 10 of 97
Wilson v. USA
as 3:2024cv00310
Petitioner:
Shaneeka Curry Wilson
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 7:2024cv00003
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
CURRIE v. USA
as 1:2023cv00660
Petitioner:
EMANUEL CURRIE
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Curry v. Cogburn et al
as 3:2023cv00453
Plaintiff:
Jeriton Lavar Curry
Defendant:
Max O. Cogburn, David Cayer, David Keesler and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
ANDERSON v. WINSTON SALEM POLICE DEPARTMENT
as 1:2023cv00264
Plaintiff:
ALBERT MARQUAVIOUSLAMAR ANDERSON
Defendant:
WINSTON SALEM POLICE DEPARTMENT, BOBBY F. KIMBROUGH, CATRINA AMELIA THOMPSON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
FOXX et al v. DOUGLAS et al
as 1:2023cv00205
Plaintiff:
DARRELL FOXX, DUNBAR DEVELOPMENT COMPANY LLC and PAUL L. DUNBAR GROUP, INC.
Defendant:
MICHAEL DOUGLAS, CHRISTOPHER CURRY, MAYOR BARBRA MALLET and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Curry v. USA
as 3:2023cv00032
Petitioner:
Jeriton Lavar Curry
Respondent:
USA
Interested Party:
USA2255Group
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 7:2022cv00218
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
In re: NOVANT HEALTH, INC.
as 1:2022cv00697
Plaintiff:
KEVIN CURRY and CHRISTINE CURRY
Defendant:
NOVANT HEALTH, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity
SIMERSON v. TODD et al
as 1:2022cv00419
Plaintiff:
TERRY SIMERSON
Defendant:
JONATHAN TODD, SIMMONS, CURRY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
