Cases 1 - 10 of 18
Herrera v. Warden P. Adams
as 5:2019cv00240
Respondent:
Warden P. Adams
Petitioner:
Curt Herrera
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Adkins et al v. CSX Transportation, Inc. et al
as 3:2018cv00321
Plaintiff:
Justin Adkins , Edwin Glowacki , Kevin Palmer and others
Defendant:
CSX Transportation, Inc., CSX Corporation, Craig S. Heligman and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001
Joe Hand Promotions, Inc. v. The Millstone Bar and Grill, Inc. et al
as 1:2016cv00079
Plaintiff:
Joe Hand Promotions, Inc.
Defendant:
The Millstone Bar and Grill, Inc., Evangeline Metz-Darling, Virginia M. Metz and others
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 605
Gonsalves et al v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 2:2015cv14622
Plaintiff:
Emma M. Gonsalves and Curt Gonsalves
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc. and Johnson & Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Moss et al v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 2:2015cv10358
Plaintiff:
Penny Sue Moss and Curt Moss
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc. and Johnson & Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Morgan et al v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 2:2014cv28094
Plaintiff:
Beth Morgan and Curt Morgan
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc. and Johnson & Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Rhodes v. E. I. du Pont de Nemours and Company
as 2:2014cv27993
Plaintiff:
Curt Andrew Rhodes
Defendant:
E. I. du Pont de Nemours and Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2014cv00093
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
Sanborn et al v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 2:2014cv21109
Plaintiff:
Cheryl Sanborn and Curt L. Sanborn
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc. and Johnson & Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Metzgar et al v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 2:2014cv17996
Plaintiff:
Karen Metzgar and Curt Metzgar
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc. and Johnson & Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
