Cases 1 - 10 of 22
Gomez v. Nessinger
as 1:2022cv00437
Petitioner:
Duane Curtis Gomez
Respondent:
Michael Nessinger
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv00221
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Civil Rights Violation
Munir et al v. The Rhode Island Superior Court Corporation
as 1:2022cv00039
Plaintiff:
Hasim Munir and Gregory Hampton-Boyd
Defendant:
The Rhode Island Superior Court Corporation
Petitioner:
Curtis Maxie and Juan Gibson
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 241 Conspiracy Against Citizen Rights
inMusic Brands, Inc. v. Curtis International, Ltd.
as 1:2021cv00287
Plaintiff:
inMusic Brands, Inc.
Defendant:
Curtis International, Ltd.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271
inMusic Brands, Inc. v. Curtis International, Ltd.
as 1:2021cv00286
Plaintiff:
inMusic Brands, Inc.
Defendant:
Curtis International, Ltd.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125
Curtis v. Embrace Home Loans, Inc. et al
as 1:2018cv00057
Plaintiff:
David Curtis
Defendant:
Embrace Home Loans, Inc. and Roundpoint Mortgage Servicing Corporation
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1601
Honeycutt v. 125 Canal Street, LLC et al
as 1:2017cv00239
Plaintiff:
Devin Honeycutt
Defendant:
125 Canal Street, LLC, Fat Belly's, Inc., Scott Parker and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Conservation Law Foundation v. McCarthy, et al
as 1:2015cv00165
Plaintiff:
Conservation Law Foundation
Defendant:
Regina McCarthy and H. Curtis Spalding
Cause Of Action: 33 U.S.C. § 1365
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2014cv00183
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Munson v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 1:2013cv03793
Plaintiff:
Curtis Munson
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
