Cases 11 - 20 of 25
Smith v. Indiana State of et al
as 3:2018cv00644
Plaintiff:
Bradley Smith
Defendant:
Ronald Neal, M Hubbard, Sherry Fritter and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
SMALLWOOD v. ZATECKY et al
as 1:2018cv01038
Respondent:
CURTIS T. HILL and DUSHAN ZATECKY
Miscellaneou:
PENDLETON CF (Court Use Only)
Petitioner:
HOWARD SMALLWOOD
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
SELBY v. HILL et al
as 3:2017cv00164
Defendant:
KATHY ALVEY, ROBERT E. CARTER, JR., CURTIS T. HILL, JR. and others
Miscellaneou:
BRANCHVILLE CF (Court Use Only)
Plaintiff:
JODY D. SELBY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Daren Ridley v. Curtis Hill, Jr.
as 17-1726
Petitioner - Appellant:
DAREN E. RIDLEY
Respondent - Appellee:
CURTIS T. HILL, JR.
Daren E. Ridley v. Curtis T. Hill, Jr.
as 17-1481
Petitioner - Appellant:
DAREN E. RIDLEY
Respondent - Appellee:
CURTIS T. HILL, JR.
Mayweather-Brown v. Elkhart Co Sheriffs Dept et al
as 3:2017cv00178
Plaintiff:
Quintin Mayweather-Brown
Defendant:
Elkhart Co Sheriffs Dept, Bradley Rodgers, Jhon Perry and others
Miscellaneous_party:
WESTVILLE E-FILE(Court Use Only)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Mayweather-Brown v. Rodgers et al
as 3:2016cv00755
Plaintiff:
Quintin Jamar Mayweather-Brown
Defendant:
Brad Rodgers, Jhon Perry, Steffany Bigler and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Mayweather-Brown v. Rodgers et al
as 3:2016cv00445
Plaintiff:
Quintin Mayweather-Brown
Defendant:
Bradley Rodgers, Ron Harvey, Fred Mock and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Mayweather-Brown v. Rodgers et al
as 3:2016cv00444
Plaintiff:
Quintin Mayweather-Brown
Defendant:
Brad Rodgers, Jhon Perry, Steffany Bigler and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Mayweather-Brown v. Elkhart County Sheriff Dept et al
as 3:2016cv00381
Plaintiff:
Q Mayweather-Brown
Defendant:
Elkhart County Sheriff Dept, Bradley Rodgers, Charley Payne and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
