Cases 21 - 30 of 44
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2018cv01083
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 754
Patterson v. Prosecutors of Cuyahoga County, Ohio
as 1:2018cv00738
Plaintiff:
Ennis R. Patterson
Defendant:
Prosecutors of Cuyahoga County, Ohio
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Dedrick v. Cuyahoga County et al
as 1:2018cv00536
Plaintiff:
Keith Dedrick
Defendant:
Cuyahoga County, Ohio, Clifford Pinkney, Ken Mills and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Pringle v. Government Office of Cuyahoga County Ohio Prosecution et al
as 1:2017cv02425
Plaintiff:
Roger Pringle
Defendant:
Government Office of Cuyahoga County Ohio Prosecution and United States Government
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Peric v. Cuyahoga County Ohio et al
as 1:2017cv02343
Plaintiff:
Ante Peric
Defendant:
Cuyahoga County Ohio, City of Strongsville Ohio , Joy A. Peric and others
Cause Of Action: 48 U.S.C. § 1985
Bolden v. Cuyahoga County Sheriff's Department, et al.,
as 1:2017cv02317
Plaintiff:
Fredrick Bolden
Defendant:
Cuyahoga County Sheriff's Department and Warden Cuyahoga County, Ohio
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
SRB Servicing, LLC v. McIntyre et al
as 1:2017cv00665
Plaintiff:
SRB Servicing, LLC
Defendant:
Cynthia Allen McIntyre, Stedson R. McIntyre, Third Federal Savings and Loan Association of Cleveland and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Abderrazzaq v. Pinkney et al
as 1:2015cv00773
Plaintiff:
Sonja Abderrazzaq
Defendant:
Clifford Pinkney , Cuyahoga County, Ohio and Regina Watts
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Macon v. Cuyahoga County, Ohio et al
as 1:2014cv01942
Plaintiff:
Gary Macon
Defendant:
Cuyahoga County, Ohio and Timothey McGinty
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lympany et al v. Cuyahoga County, Ohio
as 1:2012cv02318
Plaintiff:
John Lympany , Claire M. Akers , Allison Apel and others
Defendant:
Cuyahoga County, Ohio
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
