Cases 1 - 10 of 13
Joseph Engel v. Cybelle Webber
as 23-2908
Petitioner / Appellant:
Joseph Michael Devon Engel
Respondent / Appellee:
Cybelle Webber
Curl v. Webber
as 6:2023cv03121
Petitioner:
Brett Shannon Curl
Respondent:
Cybelle Webber
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Engel v. Webber
as 4:2023cv00289
Petitioner:
Joseph M. Engel
Respondent:
Cybelle Webber
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Knox v. Webber
as 6:2023cv03064
Petitioner:
Tony Ken Knox
Respondent:
Cybelle Webber
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Knox v. Webber
as 6:2023cv03023
Petitioner:
Tony Ken Knox
Respondent:
Cybelle Webber
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Engel v. Webber
as 4:2022cv00598
Petitioner:
Joseph Michael Devon Engel
Respondent:
Cybelle Webber
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Henson et al v. Stange et al
as 1:2022cv00068
Plaintiff:
Jack Henson
Defendant:
Bill Stange, Cybelle Webber, Shaun Burch and others
Petitioner:
Cynthia Kimmel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Geanard Howard v. Matt Sturm, et al
as 20-2798
Defendant / Appellee:
Tim Burris, Censorship Committee (TCC), Matt Sturm, Deputy Division Director, Cybelle Webber, Censorship Committee (TCC) and others
Defendant:
Unknown Hadley, Censorship Committee (SCCC) and Unknown Ballinger, Censorship Committee (SCCC)
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Geanard E. Howard
Howard v. Sturm et al
as 4:2018cv02024
Defendant:
Cindy Griffith, Tim Burris, Cybelle Webber and others
Plaintiff:
Geanard E. Howard
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Howard et al v. Arnold et al
as 4:2018cv01374
Defendant:
Karen Arnold, Tim Burris, Cybelle Webber and others
Plaintiff:
Geanard E. Howard
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
