Cases 1 - 10 of 14
MADISON v. WETZEL et al
as 2:2014cv01263
Plaintiff:
LAWRENCE MADISON
Defendant:
JOHN WETZEL, MELVIN LOCKETT, CYNTHIA L. DAUB and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Fattah v. PA Board of Probation & Parole et al
as 3:2011cv00985
Petitioner:
Abdel Fattah
Respondent:
PA Board of Probation & Parole, Cynthia L. Daub, Shirley R Moore Smeal and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
CHAMBERS v. DAUB
as 1:2010cv00271
Plaintiff:
LARRY CHAMBERS
Defendant:
CYNTHIA L. DAUB
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
SIMMONS v. CITY OF PHILADELPHIA POLICE DEPT. et al
as 2:2010cv05435
Plaintiff:
EZEKIEL SIMMONS
Defendant:
CITY OF PHILADELPHIA POLICE DEPT., DANIEL O'MALLY, JANE DOE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BOYD
as 2:2010cv01295
Plaintiff:
WALTER WILLIAM BOYD, SR.
Defendant:
LOUIS S. FOLINO, HEATHER M. YATES, CYNTHIA L. DAUB and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Fattah v. John Doe #1 et al
as 3:2010cv01607
Plaintiff:
Abdel Fattah
Defendant:
John Doe #1, Kelly A Mitra, Cynthia L Daub and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
BARBER v. DIGUGLIELMO et al
as 2:2010cv00497
Plaintiff:
ANTOINE BARBER
Respondent:
DAVID DIGUGLIELMO, THOMAS ROWLANDS, JEFFREY BEARD and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
DORSEY v. DAUB et al
as 2:2009cv03879
Plaintiff:
STEVEN DORSEY
Defendant:
CYNTHIA L. DAUB, JEFFREY A. BEARD, DAVID GOODE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
PATCHES v. RENDELL et al
as 1:2009cv00188
Plaintiff:
THOMAS E. PATCHES
Defendant:
RENDELL, PENNSYLVANIA PAROLE DEPARTMENT, CYNTHIA L. DAUB and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
PREVET v. BARONE et al
as 1:2009cv00160
Plaintiff:
JEROME PREVET
Defendant:
MICHAEL C. BARONE, PAUL A. ENNIS, GRAHAM and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
