Cases 31 - 40 of 67
Willie Mack v. Warden D. B. Drew, et al
as 10-12679
Plaintiff - Appellant:
WILLIE LOUIS MACK
Defendant - Appellee:
D. B. DREW, ROSIE LEE HAAS, Unit Manager, SANDRA ABNER, Gamma B-Side Cae Manager and others
Shaw v. Drew et al
as 9:2010cv80614
Plaintiff:
Carlos E. Shaw
Defendant:
D. B. Drew and Attorney General of the State of Florida
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Jeremy Pinson v. E. J. Chipi, et al
as 10-12235
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JEREMY PINSON
Defendant - Appellee:
E. J. CHIPI, D. MONTALVO and D. B. DREW
BAILEY et al v. AMERICAN CORRECTIONAL ASSOCIATION et al
as 2:2010cv01833
Plaintiff:
ARI BAILEY, DAMION NELSON, JASPER JOCKERY and others
Defendant:
AMERICAN CORRECTIONAL ASSOCIATION, HARELY G. LAPPIN, CONNELLY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Brown v. Drew et al
as 5:2010cv00116
Defendant:
FNU Acebal, FNU Lee, FNU Negron and others
Plaintiff:
Christopher Michael Brown
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Coyne v. USA et al
as 1:2010cv00665
Plaintiff:
Jeffrey J. Coyne
Defendant:
USA, Federal Bureau of Prisons, D. B. Drew and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
William Reynolds v. Tamyra Jarvis, et al
as 10-11214
Plaintiff - Appellant:
WILLIAM O. REYNOLDS
Defendant - Appellee:
TAMYRA JARVIS, Acting Warden, FCC Coleman - Low, D. B. DREW, Warden, FCC Coleman Complex and MR. FNU FLOURNOY, A.W. Coleman Medium
Nunes v. Drew et al
as 5:2010cv00087
Plaintiff:
Richard A. Nunes
Defendant:
D. B. Drew, Carol Whitlock, Rafael Roman and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Hill v. Drew
as 1:2009cv23663
Plaintiff:
Demetrice Hill
Defendant:
D B Drew
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Mack v. Drew et al
as 1:2009cv02469
Plaintiff:
Willie Louis Mack
Defendant:
D B Drew, Rosie Lee Haas, Sandra Abner and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
