Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Horton v. Fenlon et al
as 1:2013cv01089
Plaintiff:
Willie Horton
Defendant:
Blake Davis, Mark Collins, P. Rangel and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Mauchlin v. Davis et al
as 1:2012cv01449
Plaintiff:
Peter P. Mauchlin
Defendant:
B.R. Davis, Zhan, Munsen and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Horton v. Rangel et al
as 1:2012cv00349
Plaintiff:
Willie Horton
Defendant:
Blake R. Davis, Mark Collins, P. Rangel and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Thornton-Bey v. Davis et al
as 1:2011cv02927
Plaintiff:
DeJuan B. Thornton-Bey
Defendant:
B. Davis, L. Milusnic, C. Synsvoll and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Anonymous Human Rights Activist v. Rangel et al
as 1:2011cv00747
Plaintiff:
Anonymous Human Rights Activist
Defendant:
P. Rangel, Szemborki, Debra Locke and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Mecham et al v. George et al
as 1:2010cv02269
Plaintiff:
Leonidas Ralph Mecham, Leroy Michael Schweitzer and Luke Ammon of Preacher
Defendant:
J. George, G. Ramirez, G. Bream and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Supermax Prison Activist et al v. Foster et al
as 1:2010cv02039
Plaintiff:
Supermax Prison Activist and 50 Mentally Ill Inmates
Defendant:
D. Foster, G. Bream, Szemborki and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Stine v. Davis et al
as 1:2010cv00751
Plaintiff:
Mikeal Glenn Stine
Defendant:
Blake Davis, Christopher Synsvoll, Mark Collins and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Akers v. Weinshienk et al
as 1:2010cv00067
Plaintiff:
Montgomery Carl Akers
Defendant:
Zita L. Weinshienk, Robert Blackburn, Lewis T. Babcock and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Akers v. Daniel et al
as 1:2009cv02840
Plaintiff:
Montgomery Carl Akers
Defendant:
Wiley Y. Daniel, Lewis T. Babcock, Zita L. Weinshienk and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
