Cases 1 - 10 of 53
Jordan #878874 v. Tinerella et al
as 1:2023cv00645
Plaintiff:
Demetree D. Jordan #878874
Defendant:
Kevin Tinerella, Oshar Stewart, Ethan Partridge and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jordan #878874 v. Tinerella et al
as 1:2023cv00226
Plaintiff:
Demetree D. Jordan #878874
Defendant:
Kevin Tinerella, Oshar Stewart, Ethan Partridge and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jordan, Isaiah v. Cooper, Sara et al
as 3:2022cv00692
Plaintiff:
Isaiah D. Jordan
Defendant:
Sarah Cooper, Holly Gunderson, Timothy Thomas and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jordan v. Warden FCI Pekin
as 1:2022cv01383
Petitioner:
Darrian D Jordan
Respondent:
Warden FCI Pekin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Jordan v. Warden FCI Pekin
as 1:2022cv01362
Petitioner:
Darrian D Jordan
Respondent:
Warden FCI Pekin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Jordan v. Ripp et al
as 2:2022cv03262
Plaintiff:
Courtney D. Jordan
Defendant:
Steven Ripp, Brian Keyes, Liam Kelly and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Jackson v. Kahl et al
as 3:2020cv03327
Defendant:
William Bar, Macoupin County State of Illinois, Mary Dambacher and others
Plaintiff:
Derrick Jackson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jackson v. Kahl et al
as 3:2020cv01324
Defendant:
John D. Jordan, Donald W. Washington, William Bar and others
Petitioner:
Derrick Jackson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Rush v. Kahl et al
as 3:2020cv03326
Defendant:
William Bar, Macoupin County State of Illinois, Mary Dambacher and others
Plaintiff:
Andre A. Rush and Andre A Rush
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Shaw v. Kahl et al
as 3:2020cv03324
Plaintiff:
Brandon Q. Shaw
Defendant:
William Bar, John M. Lynch, John T. Bird and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
