Cases 1 - 10 of 14
Plowman v. Travis et al
as 1:2024cv02174
Not Yet Classified:
Brent Bradberry and Mike Wilson
Plaintiff:
Mr Timothy Plowman
Defendant:
Daniel Travis and D & R Salvage, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Tort/Motor Vehicle (P.I.)
Plowman v. Travis et al
as 2:2024cv02174
Not Yet Classified:
Brent Bradberry
Plaintiff:
Mr Timothy Plowman
Defendant:
Daniel Travis and D & R Salvage, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Tort/Motor Vehicle (P.I.)
McCain et al v. D & R Construction and Contracting, LLC et al
as 3:2022cv00733
Plaintiff:
Michael McCain, James D. Hornsby and Southern Electrical Retirement Fund
Defendant:
D & R Construction and Contracting, LLC and Richard Harris
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001 E.R.I.S.A.: Employee Retirement
D & R Services, LLC et al v. Mesa Underwriters Specialty Insurance Company
as 1:2022cv01087
Not Classified By Court:
Sam Rainwaters
Plaintiff:
D & R Services, LLC and DD & KD Services, LLC
Defendant:
Mesa Underwriters Selective Insurance Company and Mesa Underwriters Specialty Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Insurance Contract
Jordan v. Stephens
as 2:2015cv02699
Petitioner:
John Jordan, Jr.
Respondent:
D. R. Stephens
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Anderson v. Stephens
as 2:2015cv02341
Petitioner:
Mervin Glen Anderson
Respondent:
D. R. Stephens
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Means v. Stephens
as 2:2015cv02067
Petitioner:
Willie Clay Means
Respondent:
D. R. Stephens
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Mason v. Stephens
as 2:2014cv02671
Petitioner:
James Mason
Respondent:
D. R. Stephens
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Cathey v. Stephens
as 2:2013cv02406
Petitioner:
Gregory Cathey
Respondent:
D. R. Stephens
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Bartholomew v. Stephens et al
as 2:2012cv02657
Petitioner:
Wayne Bartholomew
Respondent:
D. R. Stephens, D. Hendrix, S. Culbertson and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
