Cases 1 - 10 of 11
CASE NUMBER NOT USED
as 1:2021cv02786
Plaintiff:
DAN ALTSCHULD, MARK S AMATO, Cynthia MATSUMOTO and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551
ALTSCHULD et al v. RAIMONDO et al
as 1:2021cv02779
Plaintiff:
DAN ET AL ALTSCHULD, DAN ALTSCHULD, MARK S AMATO and others
Not Classified By Court:
LLOYD J. AUSTIN, III, MERRICK B. GARLAND, ALEJANDRO MAYORKAS and others
Defendant:
Secretary GINA M. RAIMONDO and GINA M. RAIMONDO
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 0701
SMITH v. USA
as 1:2020cv01205
Petitioner:
DARRYL D. WILLIAMS
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
WILLIAMS v. RED COATS, INC. et al
as 1:2020cv00571
Defendant:
DEINE AVILA and RED COATS, INC.
Plaintiff:
ROBYN D. WILLIAMS
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2015cv00896
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
WILLIAMS v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al
as 1:2015mc00283
Petitioner:
AARON D. WILLIAMS
Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA and ERIC H. HOLDER, JR.
Cause Of Action: Complaint
WILLIAMS v. HEALTH MANAGMENT ASSOCIATES INC. et al
as 1:2014cv00574
Defendant:
HEALTH MANAGEMENT ASSOCIATES INC , JOHN DOE HOSPITALS and MONROE HMA LLC
Plaintiff:
RALPH D. WILLIAMS
Intervenor_plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 31 U.S.C. § 3729
IN RE: HEALTH MANAGEMENT ASSOCIATES, INC. QUI TAM LITIGATION (NO. II)
as 1:2014mc00339
Plaintiff:
CRAIG S. BRUMMER , THOMAS L. MASON , STEVEN G. FOLSTAD and others
Defendant:
HEALTH MANAGEMENT ASSOCIATES, INC. , MONROE HMA LLC , WINDER HMA LLC and others
Movant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Intervenor_plaintiff:
USA
Cause Of Action: 31 U.S.C. § 3729
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2012cv00114
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2010cv00070
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
