Cases 1 - 10 of 55
Williams v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv00360
Plaintiff:
Philip D. Williams
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Williams v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2023cv03605
Plaintiff:
Napoleon D. Williams
Defendant:
C.R. Bard, Inc. and Davol, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Williams et al. v. Cuyahoga County et al.
as 1:2023cv01879
Plaintiff:
Nancy L Williams, T. T., Justin D Williams and others
Defendant:
Cuyahoga County, Cuyahoga County Division of Children and Family Services, County Executive of Cuyahoga County and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Williams v. Boston Scientific Corp.
as 3:2023cv01409
Plaintiff:
Sondra D. Williams
Defendant:
Boston Scientific Corp.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
v. Association of American Railroads et al
as 2:2023cv02095
Defendant:
Association of American Railroads, Dave Yost, Commissioner Jenifer French and others
v. Association of American Railroads et al
as 2:2023oe02095
Defendant:
Association of American Railroads, Dave Yost, Commissioner Jenifer French and others
Association of American Railroads v. Yost et al
as 2:2023cv02096
Plaintiff:
Association of American Railroads
Defendant:
Dave Yost, Commissioner Jenifer French, Commissioner Daniel R Conway and others
Williams v. Goldman Sachs Bank, USA
as 2:2023cv01949
Plaintiff:
Detrica D. Williams
Defendant:
Goldman Sachs Bank, USA
Cause Of Action: 09 U.S.C. § 1 U.S. Arbitration Act
Williams v. Bobby
as 5:2022cv01726
Petitioner:
Cameron D. Williams
Respondent:
Warden David Bobby
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Kuhlman v. City of Cleveland, et al
as 1:2022cv00536
Defendant:
City of Cleveland, Officer David Grasha, Officer Samantha Haggerty and others
Plaintiff:
Gina Kuhlman
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
