Cases 1 - 10 of 15,995
Toxqui et al v. R&P Pizza Corp., d/b/a D'Angelo's Pizzeria and Restaurant et al
as 1:2024cv03339
Plaintiff:
Veronica Toxqui and Raul Giron
Defendant:
R&P Pizza Corp., d/b/a D'Angelo's Pizzeria and Restaurant doing business as d/b/a D'Angelo's Pizzeria and Restaurant, Rigoberto Jimenez and Pablo Rosales
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Wynn v. Harris
as 1:2024cv03368
Plaintiff:
James Eric Wynn
Defendant:
Annette D. Watkins Harris
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Pal v. Tallberg et al
as 3:2024cv00792
Plaintiff:
Neelu Pal
Defendant:
James N Tallberg, Andrew J Glass, Patrick D Allen and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
770 Hot Springs Road LLC v. Renaissance Rental Properties, LLC d/b/a Renaissance Condominium Partners II et al
as 7:2024cv03288
Plaintiff:
770 Hot Springs Road LLC
Defendant:
Renaissance Rental Properties, LLC d/b/a Renaissance Condominium Partners II and LC Main, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 bc Diversity-Breach of Contract
EXCELLUS HEALTH PLAN, INC. d/b/a EXCELLUS BLUECROSS BLUESHIELD v. BLACKFLY INVESTMENTS, LLC d/b/a MOLECULAR TESTING LABS
as 6:2024cv06263
Plaintiff:
EXCELLUS HEALTH PLAN, INC. d/b/a EXCELLUS BLUECROSS BLUESHIELD
Defendant:
BLACKFLY INVESTMENTS, LLC d/b/a MOLECULAR TESTING LABS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Other Contract
Hanson v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2024cv00414
Plaintiff:
Kimberly D. Hanson
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Burrell v. Bishop
as 24-1155
Plaintiff:
AKO K. BURRELL
Defendant:
BISHOP, Deputy of Security, Sergeant LOCKE, Sergeant CONTO and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00478
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
Jon Tate Construction, LLC et al v. Sika Corporation et al
as 1:2024cv03229
Plaintiff:
Jon Tate Construction, LLC and Jon S. Garrett d/b/a Black River Masonry, on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated
Defendant:
Sika Corporation, Sika AG, Chryso, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1 Antitrust Litigation (Monopolizing Trade)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
