Cases 1 - 10 of 7,284
Clay v. O' Malley
as 4:2024cv00083
Plaintiff:
Eric D. Clay
Defendant:
Martin O' Malley
Interested Party:
Social Security Administration and United States Attorney's Office for the Southern District of Georgia
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Karen Littrell v. Martin O'Malley
as 24-1923
Plaintiff:
Karen D. Littrell
Defendant:
Martin O'Malley, Commissioner of Social Security Administration
Hanson v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2024cv00414
Plaintiff:
Kimberly D. Hanson
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
WILES JR. v. O'MALLEY
as 1:2024cv00731
Plaintiff:
TIMOTHY D. WILES JR.
Defendant:
MARTIN O'MALLEY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWW)
Magill v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2024cv00383
Plaintiff:
Cody D. Magill
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Minor v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2024cv00350
Plaintiff:
Gregory D Minor
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Hugins v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 2:2024cv00734
Plaintiff:
Valery D. Hugins
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Interested Party:
SSA-Office of the General Counsel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Jonathan Cain v. Martin O'Malley
as 24-1590
Plaintiff:
JONATHAN D. CAIN
Defendant:
MARTIN J. O'MALLEY, Commissioner of Social Security
Maxey v. O'Malley
as 1:2024cv02810
Plaintiff:
Michele D. Maxey
Defendant:
Commissioner Martin J. O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
BROUGH v. O'MALLEY
as 2:2024cv00110
Plaintiff:
THELMA D. BROUGH
Defendant:
MARTIN J. O'MALLEY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
