Cases 1 - 10 of 13
Makris et al v. Makris
as 4:2022cv01267
Plaintiff:
Michael S Makris, Luther A Dulevitz and Joshua D Cooper
Defendant:
Victor N Makris
Intervenor Plaintiff:
Victor N. Makris, P.C. d/b/a Makris Law Firm, P.C. and Victor N. Makris, P.C. doing business as Makris Law Firm, P.C.
3Rd Party Defendant:
Michael S. Makris, P.C. f/k/a Makris Law Firm, P.C., Michael S. Makris, P.C. and Makris Law Firm, P.C.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2021cv00814
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Sifuentes v. Briones et al
as 4:2018cv00462
Plaintiff:
Jose Sifuentes
Defendant:
Lisa D. Cooper
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Sifuentes v. Briones et al
as 4:2017cv00971
Plaintiff:
Jose Sifuentes
Defendant:
David Briones, Roberto Perez, Joseph H. Gay and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Crain v. Director, TDCJ-CID
as 6:2017cv00158
Plaintiff:
Rubin Crain, IV
Defendant:
Director, TDCJ-CID, Lorie Davis, D Cooper and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2016cv01405
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2016cv00086
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2014cv04477
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 20 U.S.C. § 1080
Fleming,et al v. Nelson
as 4:2009cv00519
Defendant:
Derek A Nelson
Plaintiff:
Beverly Fleming, James C Cooper, James D Cooper and others
Cause Of Action: 12 U.S.C. § 22 Securities Fraud
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2009cv00592
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Employment Discrimination
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
