Cases 1 - 10 of 100
Frith v. eMortgage Funding LLC
as 2:2026cv13502
Plaintiff:
Shane Frith
Defendant:
eMortgage Funding LLC
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
Black v. Alvarado et al
as 1:2026cv00428
Plaintiff:
Alfonso Black
Defendant:
Ariel A Alvarado, Chonte T Swanson, Erica Nelms and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2026cv02416
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Frith v. Imperium Lending, LLC
as 2:2026cv12035
Plaintiff:
Shane Frith
Defendant:
Imperium Lending, LLC
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
FAYNE v. FRITH
as 4:2026cv00258
Petitioner:
VENESTER FAYNE
Defendant:
FRITH
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Ortega v. Warden of FCI-Schuylkill Camp et al
as 1:2025cv02291
Petitioner:
Carlos Joel Nieves Ortega
Respondent:
Warden of FCI-Schuylkill Camp, Warden/Acting Warden Julie Frith and Bureau of Prisons (BOP)
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Rivera-Rodriguez v. Frith
as 1:2025cv02245
Petitioner:
Julio Alberto Rivera-Rodriguez
Respondent:
Warden Frith
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Santiago v. Frith
as 4:2025cv02239
Petitioner:
Edwardo Santiago
Respondent:
J. Frith
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Giddings v. Frith
as 1:2025cv02137
Petitioner:
Byhzir B. Giddings
Respondent:
Warden J. Frith
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Jones v. Frith
as 4:2025cv01936
Petitioner:
Alonzo Tarell Jones
Respondent:
Warden J. Frith
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
