Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Lawrence Cardoza v. N. Strauss et al
as 2:2017cv09201
Plaintiff:
Lawrence Cardoza
Defendant:
D. Hitt, D. Hitt, M. Rodriguez and others
In re: Devon McKenna, et al
as 13-60091
Debtor:
In re: DEVON MCKENNA and CYNTHIA MCKENNA
Appellant:
DEVON MCKENNA and CYNTHIA MCKENNA
Appellee:
MICHAEL D. HITT, Chapter 7 Trustee, COMMONWEALTH UNITED MORTGAGE and PNC BANK, N.A.
Minor v. Hitt, et al
as 2:2012cv02267
Plaintiff:
Fausto Alejandro Minor
Defendant:
D. Hitt, S. Oschner and P. Statti
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Arline v. Gowen et al
as 2:2011cv03414
Plaintiff:
Keith Duane Arline, Jr.
Defendant:
R. Gowen, D. Davey, D. Hitt and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Arline v. Gowen et al
as 3:2011cv05627
Plaintiff:
Keith Arline
Defendant:
R. Gowen, D. Davey, D. Hitt and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Kevin King v. CDC, et al
as 11-15418
Plaintiff - Appellant:
KEVIN EUGENE KING
Defendant - Appellee:
CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, D. L. RUNNELS, JEFFREY WILLIAM ROHLFING and others
Jones v. Barron et al
as 2:2010cv00396
Plaintiff:
Marcell Jones
Defendant:
K. Barron, D. Hitt, T. Perez and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
In re: All American Bottled Water Cor, et al v. Barney Ng, et al
as 09-36050
Debtor:
In the Matter of: ALL AMERICAN BOTTLED WATER CORPORATION
Appellant:
MICHAEL D. HITT, in his capacity as the trustee for the bankruptcy estate of All American Bottled Water Corporation
Appellee:
BARNEY NG, RE LOANS LLC, BAR K INC and others
Jones v. Plessas et al
as 2:2009cv02133
Plaintiff:
Malik Jones
Defendant:
C Plessas, T Smith, - Sloan and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Barretto v. Smith et al
as 2:2007cv01544
Plaintiff:
Francisco Barretto
Defendant:
L Smith, California Department of Corrections, J. Lock and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
