Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Michael Powell v. MDOC, et al
as 22-2162
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MICHAEL LEON POWELL
Defendant / Appellee:
MICHIGAN DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, BRIAN MAJERCZYK, Oaks Mental Health Chief, ROBERTA MARSHALL, Psychologist and others
Michael Powell v. MDOC, et al
as 22-1361
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MICHAEL LEON POWELL
Defendant / Appellee:
MICHIGAN DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, BRIAN MAJERCYZK, Oaks Mental Health Chief, ROBERTA MARSHALL, Psychologist and others
Turner #169637 v. Stone et al
as 1:2019cv00623
Defendant:
Unknown Best, D. J. Pallas, Unknown Ratliff and others
Plaintiff:
Gregory S. Turner #169637
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Smith #267009 et al v. Pallas et al
as 1:2017cv00618
Plaintiff:
Derrick Lee Smith #267009 and Heather Smith
Defendant:
D. J. Pallas, Richard Russell, Unknown Goulet and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Hollis #247453 v. Nichols et al
as 1:2014cv01301
Plaintiff:
Cornelius Hollis #247453
Defendant:
Unknown Nichols, L. Smith, Unknown Gunn and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Cook #128535 v. Cashler et al
as 1:2011cv00637
Plaintiff:
Robert Charles Cook #128535
Defendant:
Unknown Cashler, Wade Wakefield, Mark O. Sutherby and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hunter #229916 v. Hammon, et al
as 2:2011cv00101
Plaintiff:
Carl Hunter #229916
Defendant:
Ted Hammon, Michigan Department of Corrections Parole and Pardon Commutation Board, People of the State of Michigan and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Poole #156288 v. Michigan Reformatory et al
as 1:2010cv00378
Plaintiff:
Dexter Poole #156288
Defendant:
C. Chaney, Unknown Stewart, Unknown Western and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Gibbs #260905 v. Bertram et al
as 1:2008cv01072
Plaintiff:
Timothy Allen Gibbs #260905
Defendant:
R. Bertram, K. Witham, J. Rowell and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
