Cases 21 - 30 of 32
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2021cv00016
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Not Classified By Court:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2021cv00011
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Not Classified By Court:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
BELLAMY v. RUMER et al
as 4:2020cv00127
Plaintiff:
GEORGE BELLAMY and MICHAEL D JOHNSON
Defendant:
WILLIAM C RUMER, MUSCOGEE COUNTY SUPERIOR COURT and JULIA SLATER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
JOHNSON v. DAKON
as 5:2019cv00433
Defendant:
CORRECTIONAL OFFICER MICHAEL DAKON
Plaintiff:
MARQUIS D JOHNSON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Johnson v. SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION
as 4:2019cv00002
Plaintiff:
Tyrone D. Johnson and TYRONE JOHNSON
Defendant:
COMMISSIONER OF THE SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION and COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
Undetermined:
SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION (NOTICE)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
HAMMOCK et al v. JOHNSON et al
as 4:2014cv00126
Plaintiff:
BILLY N HAMMOCK, TIM OGLESBY, ALEX HOLLAND and others
Defendant:
JOHNSON, WALTER E JOHNSON, PETER D JOHNSON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
JOHNSON v. TAYLOR
as 5:2014cv00190
Petitioner:
TROY D JOHNSON
Respondent:
CEDRIC TAYLOR
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
JOHNSON v. COLVIN
as 1:2014cv00050
Plaintiff:
SHARON D JOHNSON
Defendant:
CAROLYN W COLVIN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
HAMMOCK v. JOHNSON et al
as 4:2013cv00418
Plaintiff:
BILLY N HAMMOCK
Defendant:
PETER D JOHNSON, SAM CORDLE, JR, KATHERINE THROWER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
HAMMOCK v. JOHNSON et al
as 4:2013cv00350
Plaintiff:
BILLY N HAMMOCK
Defendant:
JOHNSON, SAMUEL OLENS, RICHARD A MALLARD and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
