Cases 81 - 90 of 100
Terrell v. City of Atlanta et al
as 1:2010cv01841
Plaintiff:
Willie James Terrell, Jr.
Defendant:
City of Atlanta, Atlanta Judicial Circuit, Cerelyn Davis and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
C.M. Life Insurance Company v. Copeland et al
as 1:2010cv01110
Plaintiff:
C.M. Life Insurance Company
Defendant:
Brittany T. Copeland, Kimberly D. Johnson, Amanda M. Newman and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1335
Terrell v. Pennington et al
as 1:2009cv03345
Plaintiff:
Willie James Terrell, Jr.
Defendant:
Richard J. Pennington, Cerelyn J. Davis, W. Harris, Jr. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Type:
Other Statutes
Terrell v. City of Atlanta et al
as 1:2009cv02385
Plaintiff:
Willie James Terrell, Jr.
Defendant:
City of Atlanta, Richard J. Pennington, Darrell D. Johnson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Type:
Other Statutes
Johnson v. Owens-Corning
as 1:1991cv00022
Plaintiff:
James D. Johnson, Sr.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2009cv01023
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Race)
Terrell v. Grady Memorial Hospital et al
as 1:2008cv03931
Plaintiff:
Willie J. Terrell, Jr.
Defendant:
Grady Memorial Hospital, Atlanta Police Department, C. J. Davis and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2008cv00150
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Johnson v. Freeman et al
as 1:2008cv02820
Plaintiff:
Lucious D. Johnson
Defendant:
Myron E. Freeman and The Fulton County Sheriff's Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Johnson v. Chatham County Narcotic Team et al
as 4:2008cv00075
Plaintiff:
Edward D. Johnson
Defendant:
Chatham County Narcotic Team and Chatham County Court
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.