Cases 1 - 10 of 82
Jones v. Hooker et al
as 3:2024cv03121
Plaintiff:
Gregory D Jones
Defendant:
. Hooker, 4th Dist Appt Ct Clerk (J Doe) or rep and Cynthia A Grant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jones v. Hooker et al
as 1:2024cv03862
Plaintiff:
Gregoy D Jones
Defendant:
Judge Hooker, 4th Distr Cppt-Cpt- Clerk (J Doe) or rep. and Cynthia A Grant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jones v. Loreal USA, Inc. et al
as 1:2023cv12031
Plaintiff:
Angela D Jones
Defendant:
Loreal USA, Inc., Loreal USA Products, Inc., SoftSheen-Carson, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Jones v. Revlon, Inc. et al
as 1:2023cv07685
Defendant:
Beauty Bell Enterprises LLC, Revlon, Inc., AFAM CONCEPT, INC doing business as JF Labs, Inc and others
Plaintiff:
Kywan D. Jones
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Jones v. City, Village Township Villa Park et al
as 1:2023cv03656
Plaintiff:
Deandre D. Jones
Defendant:
City, Village Township Villa Park, Village Park Police Station and Officer Kevin Pollack
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Jones v. Greene et al
as 3:2023cv03163
Plaintiff:
Gregory D Jones
Defendant:
. Greene, . Settles, John Doe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jones v. Warden Greene et al
as 1:2023cv02451
Plaintiff:
Gregory D. Jones
Defendant:
Warden Greene, Officer Settles, Case Worker 3 House and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv02053
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Edward D. Jones & Co., L.P. v. Clem
as 4:2023cv04014
Plaintiff:
Edward D Jones & Co., L.P.
Defendant:
Cory Clem
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv07242
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
