Cases 1 - 10 of 41
McClure v. Lumpkin
as 26-40194
Plaintiff:
Robert Troy McClure
Defendant:
Bobby Lumpkin, Executive Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division, Warden Carter, Todd Allen and others
Kendrick v. Carter
as 25-40691
Plaintiff:
John W. Kendrick
Defendant:
Christopher Carter, Warden II, Stiles Unit, Jerry Bordelon, Schuyler Levias and others
Kendrick v. Loflin et al
as 1:2025cv00436
Plaintiff:
John W Kendrick
Defendant:
Joshua Loflin, Lance Knod, Yulonda Douglas and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Rideaux v. Morris et al
as 1:2025cv00177
Plaintiff:
Jerald Rideaux
Defendant:
FNU Morris, FNU Gardner, D. Knod and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Carrillo v. Roesler
as 22-40214
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Timothy Carrillo
Defendant / Appellee:
Michael Roesler, Warden, Darin W. Marcinkevicius, Lieutenant, Virgil G. McMullen, Assistant Warden and others
Walton v. Davis et al
as 1:2021cv00093
Defendant:
Kolawole S. Bamigboye, Kourtney L. Hadnot, Rockella J. Neal and others
Plaintiff:
Donald Gene Walton
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Walton v. Davis et al
as 1:2020cv00447
Defendant:
Kolawole S. Bamigboye, Kourtney L. Hadnot, Rockella J. Neal and others
Plaintiff:
Donald Gene Walton
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Rosas v. Boykins et al
as 1:2020cv00413
Defendant:
Lance C Knod, Davlisha J Whitmore, Pedro M Boykins and others
Plaintiff:
Arturo Rosas
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Douglas v. Boykin et al
as 1:2019cv00306
Defendant:
Christopher L Norsworthy, Aaron L Thompkins, Bruce H Fredrick and others
Plaintiff:
Latthen Chance Douglas
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Smith v. Coleman et al
as 1:2019cv00110
Defendant:
Lance C Knod, Antionette E Manuel, TDCJ-CID Executive Director and others
Plaintiff:
David Smith
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
