Cases 1 - 10 of 13
Lee v. Turn Key Health Clinics, LLC et al
as 4:2019cv00318
Plaintiff:
John D Lee, Jr
Defendant:
Vic Regalado, William Cooper, Turn Key Health Clinics, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Molson v. Blum et al
as 1:2018cv03034
Defendant:
Jonathan P Martin, Noel E. Blum, Michael Dougherty and others
Plaintiff:
Rowena Molson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Janpol v. Lampert et al
as 2:2015cv00126
Plaintiff:
Justin D Janpol
Defendant:
Robert O Lampert, Wyoming Department of Corrections Director, Steve Hargett and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Perkins et al v. Wyoming Department of Corrections Director et al
as 1:2015cv00062
Plaintiff:
Timothy Perkins
Defendant:
Wyoming Department of Corrections Director, Robert O Lampert, Wyoming Department of Corrections Medium Correctional Institute Warden and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 14-3005
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 13-3240
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Lee v. State of Kansa
as 12-3344
Petitioner - Appellant:
UNDRA D. LEE
Respondent - Appellee:
STATE OF KANSAS
Lee (ID 60325) v. Kansas, State of
as 5:2012cv03199
Petitioner:
Undra D. Lee
Respondent:
Kansas, State of
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 11-3238
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Reedy, et al v. Werholtz
as 11-3040
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MICHAEL E. REEDY, TODD DEAL, GRANT NIXON and others
Defendant - Appellee:
ROGER WERHOLTZ, Secretary of Corrections, Kansas Department of Corrections
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
