Cases 21 - 30 of 47
Verragio Ltd. v. Skatells Manufacturing Jewelers
as 1:2016cv09355
Plaintiff:
Verragio Ltd.
Defendant:
D & M-SMJ, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101
Oliver-Vaughn v. The City of New York et al
as 1:2016cv00715
Plaintiff:
Crystal Douce Al-Dey Oliver-Vaughn
Defendant:
The City of New York, Bill De Blasio, New York City Police Commissioner and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Dillarza et al v. D & M Smoked Fish, Inc. et al
as 1:2015cv04700
Plaintiff:
Marino Aracleo and Jorge Dillarza
Defendant:
D & M Smoked Fish, Inc., Haifa Smoked Fish, Inc., Arcadi Marcovich and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Velazco-Rojas v. D&M Smoked Fish, Inc. et al
as 1:2015cv04213
Defendant:
D&M Smoked Fish, Inc., Haifa Smoked Fish, Inc., Arcadi Marcovich and others
Plaintiff:
Julio Velazco-Rojas
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Marvin v. Unger
as 6:2015cv06286
Petitioner:
Richard W. Marvin
Respondent:
D. M Unger
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Dorset v. Vitsentzos et al
as 1:2015cv00858
Plaintiff:
Shaniqua Dorset
Defendant:
D, M Vitsentzos and Maria Vitsentzos
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Auto Negligence
Faust v. Jun et al
as 6:2014cv06702
Plaintiff:
Dwayne Faust
Defendant:
Young Jun, Dr. Rao, John Doe 1 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Dale v. Unger
as 6:2014cv06471
Petitioner:
Alan W. Dale
Respondent:
D. M. Unger
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Faust v. Jun et al
as 9:2014cv00911
Plaintiff:
Dwayne Faust
Defendant:
Young Jun, Dr. Rao, John Doe 1 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
A & J Produce, Inc. et al
as 1:2014cv05169
Plaintiff:
A & J Produce, Inc. , E. Armata, Inc. , Coosemans New York, Inc. and others
Defendant:
Little Neck Meats, Inc., Little Neck Meats II, Inc., Leonard Mazur and others
Cause Of Action: 07 U.S.C. § 499
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
