Cases 1 - 10 of 116
Raymond Bradford v. P. Bracamonte, et al
as 21-56087
Plaintiff / Appellant:
RAYMOND ALFORD BRADFORD
Defendant / Appellee:
P. BRACAMONTE, Facility C Captain, W. SMITH, Correctional Lieutenant, L. STEEL, Correctional Officer and others
Hammler v. Imada et al
as 3:2021cv00149
Defendant:
D. Paramo, Covel and C. Imada
Plaintiff:
Allen Hammler
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
(PC)Alexander v. Garza et al
as 2:2020cv01560
Defendant:
Perez, Bonilla, Garza and others
Plaintiff:
Julian J. Alexander
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Dorsey v. Paramo et al
as 3:2020cv00843
Defendant:
Dr. Lee, M. Garikaparthi, E. Benyard and others
Plaintiff:
Jessie Dorsey
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
Warren v. Parsons et al
as 3:2020cv00405
Defendant:
John/Jane Doe #2, CCII L. Garnica, CCII E. Aukerman and others
Plaintiff:
Thomas Paul Warren
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
Holestine v. Covello et al
as 3:2020cv00159
Defendant:
C. Taylor, Lt. Smith, ., F. Armenta and others
Plaintiff:
Ernest Kelly Holestine
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
Martin Ware v. C. Archuleta, et al
as 19-56241
Defendant / Appellee:
R. S. O'NEAL, 2017 Correctional Officer, C. COVEL, 2017 Correctional Chief Dep. Warden, V. ACKERMAN KILOUGH, 2017 Correctional Officer and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MARTIN WARE
Holgerson v. Paramo et al
as 3:2019cv02286
Defendant:
Miss Messler, M.D. and Mr. D. Paramo
Plaintiff:
Matthew Forrey Holgerson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
David Rademaker v. D. Paramo, et al
as 19-56245
Defendant / Appellee:
R. SEGOVIA, R. DECASTRO, G. STRATTON, Chief Deputy Warden and others
Defendant:
B. SELF, R. OLSON, E. GAREZ and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DAVID RADEMAKER
Santamariamuniz v. Paramo et al
as 3:2019cv02051
Defendant:
D. Paramo and J. Cuevas
Plaintiff:
Cesar Santamariamuniz
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
