Cases 31 - 40 of 57
KING v. DODRILL et al
as 2:2009cv02790
Plaintiff:
STEVEN J. KING
Defendant:
D. SCOTT DODRILL, PAUL M. SCHULTZ, RUBEN MORALES and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Pittman v. Bledsoe et al
as 3:2009cv01170
Petitioner:
Darnell Pittman
Respondent:
B. A. Bledsoe, F. Gambone, C. Moore and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
ALBERT v. WARDEN JOHN YOST et al
as 3:2009cv00116
Plaintiff:
CHARLES ELVIN ALBERT
Defendant:
WARDEN JOHN YOST, JEFFREY TRIBATH, ROBIN GOLDEN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
WYNN v. DODRILL
as 2:2009cv01917
Petitioner:
MACK WYNN
Respondent:
D. SCOTT DODRILL
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Crumby v. Martinez et al
as 3:2008cv01900
Plaintiff:
David Crumby
Defendant:
R. Martinez, Mr. Tanner and D. Scott Dodrill
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Guerrero v. DEWEY et al
as 3:2008cv01568
Plaintiff:
Fernando Escobedo Guerrero
Defendant:
DEWEY, Case Manager at FCI Allwenwood Medium, Jane Doe and others
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Ramirez v. Martinez et al
as 4:2008cv01034
Petitioner:
Carlos Ramirez
Respondent:
Jerry Martinez, Douglas Sabin, Scott Blake and others
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Jean-Pierre v. Holt et al
as 1:2008cv00991
Plaintiff:
Steven Jean-Pierre
Defendant:
Ronnie R. Holt, C. Moore, A. Jordan and others
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Robinson v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al
as 1:2008cv00932
Plaintiff:
Gary Robinson
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Harley G. Lappin, Harrell Watts and others
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Hart v. Whalen et al
as 3:2008cv00828
Plaintiff:
Jamal Hart
Defendant:
Walter Whalen, Barry Stahl, R. Scandle and others
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
