Cases 1 - 10 of 321
Kim Florence v. District Attorney of Columbus, et al
as 24-11037
Plaintiff:
KIM CAMILLE FLORENCE
Defendant:
DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF COLUMBUS, MAYOR OF COLUMBUS, SHERIFF OF COLUMBUS and others
Joe Hand Promotions, Inc. v. Island Vibes Kava, Inc.
as 9:2024cv80236
Plaintiff:
Joe Hand Promotions, Inc.
Defendant:
Island Vibes Kava, Inc. d/b/a Island Vibes Kava Bar, David Branda, Ricardo J Rivera and others
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 0605 Unauthorized publication or use of communications
USA v. Sandra Smith
as 23-13853
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
SANDRA D. SMITH
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv01229
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Not Classified By Court:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
SMITH v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 9:2023cv16452
Plaintiff:
CHARLES D SMITH, JR
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
SMITH v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 9:2023cv15423
Plaintiff:
RAYMOND D SMITH
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
SMITH SR v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 9:2023cv10749
Plaintiff:
CHARLES D SMITH SR
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
SMITH v. 3M COMPANY
as 7:2023cv03088
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL D SMITH
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
SMITH-BERGMAN v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2023cv24062
Plaintiff:
JASON D SMITH-BERGMAN
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Lietzke v. City of Birmingham et al (MAG+)
as 2:2023cv01108
Plaintiff:
Bill Lietzke
Defendant:
City of Birmingham and Patrick D. Smith
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
